Huh, so I've been really looking into politics lately.
I quite recently got this letter from one of our senators, because I e-mailed his office, telling him what I thought about animal testing:
Dear Ms. Jones :
Thank you for conta cting me to expre ss your oppos ition to testi ng drugs and cosme tics on anima ls. I share your conce rn for the welfa re of anima ls, and I am suppo rtive of legis latio n to help our count ry move away from its use of anima ls in clini cal tests .
Curre ntly, anima ls are used for myria d scien tific tests . Some of these , such as testi ng anima ls’ intel ligen ce or obser ving their socia l inter actio ns, are benig n and contr ibute to scien tists ’ under stand ing of biolo gy, psych ology , and socio logy. On the other hand, many tests done on anima ls are used to test chemi cals for safet y in use on human s. These “toxi city tests ” can be painf ul for the anima ls: resea rcher s expos e anima ls to chemi cals in order to disco ver under what circu mstan ces a chemi cal is dange rous. It is a logic al neces sity in these tests that anima ls will suffe r – in fact, the entir e test is desig ned to learn when and how anima ls suffe r.
Becau se anima l testi ng is often inhum ane and canno t guara ntee benef its to human s, there is a movem ent to shift our regul atory agenc ies’ focus away from anima l- safet y tests to non- anima l tests . I am fully suppo rtive of this endea vor, and was stron gly suppo rtive of the Inter agenc y Coord inati ng Commi ttee on the Valid ation of Alter nativ e Metho ds Act of 2000, which estab lishe d the feder al agenc y charg ed with devel oping and certi fying non- anima l tests . I comme nd this agenc y’s impor tant work, and I conti nue to suppo rt it throu gh incre ased fundi ng. I am hopef ul that in the comin g years , the ICCVA M will provi de resea rcher s with more effec tive, more human e tests .
Anima l welfa re is perso nally impor tant to me. In the curre nt Congr ess, I am a cospo nsor of sever al bills to prote ct compa nion anima ls: S. 714, the Pet Safet y and Prote ction Act; S. 1880, which would make dog- fight ing a feder al crime ; and S. 2439, which would requi re the Feder al Burea u of Inves tigat ion to track anima l- cruel ty crime s natio nwide . I also stron gly suppo rted the Anima l Fight ing Prohi bitio n Enfor cemen t Act, which passe d the Senat e in April and is now feder al law. I have also pushe d the Appro priat ions Commi ttee to provi de fundi ng to the Feder al Emerg ency Manag ement Agenc y ( FEMA) to devel op plans for evacu ating pets durin g emerg encie s, such as shoul d have happe ned in Hurri cane Katri na.
In addit ion to prote cting pets, I am also commi tted to promo ting the safet y and well- being of farm anima ls. I am a spons or of S. 311, the Horse Slaug hter Preve ntion Act, which would make it illeg al to slaug hter horse s for human consu mptio n. Worki ng with the Human e Socie ty of the Unite d State s, I have pushe d for incre ased fundi ng to enfor ce the laws which prote ct farm anima ls, inclu ding the Anima l Welfa re Act and the Human e Metho ds of Slaug hter Act.
I have long belie ved that a socie ty’s treat ment of its most vulne rable membe rs – inclu ding anima ls – is the best measu re of its civil izati on. The prote ction s that our natio n affor ds anima ls are the mark of our colle ctive human ity.
Again , thank you for conta cting me on this impor tant issue . Pleas e do not hesit ate to conta ct me in the futur e if I can ever be of help on this or any other matte r.
Since rely,
Charl es E. Schum er
Unite d State s Senat or
He doesn 't get it. We human s do not need anima l testi ng. If we can clone and raise clone d dogs, then we can clone human tissu es, and test on those . Dogs, rabbi ts, monke ys, and cats are prima rily the ones to be teste d on, and genet icall y, they all are so diffe rent from human s; even the monke ys, every one. Anima l testi ng is ridic ulous . Anima ls shoul d never be tortu red "in the name of scien ce." They shoul dn't ever be tortu red. I don' t see anima ls going aroun d, shoot ing peopl e and whatn ot; killi ng for some sense less cause ... it just doesn 't make any sense at all. Every speci es is so diffe rent from one anoth er, that human s die becau se they take drugs that were teste d on anima ls and calle d "all good. " Shovi ng eyeli ner into a rabbi t's eye will not show a human how much that eye liner will hurt one' s eye, or if that human will have an aller gic react ion. Now, testi ng on anima ls to learn how they react with knowl edge, and whatn ot. Awww, how cute, a goril la playi ng with some Legos on a table , sitti ng on a chair , in some seclu ded room. .. wtf? ! Plus, does that goril la get to then after go along and be with its famil y in the rain fores t? No, it gets put in a cage and fed some leave s every once in a while . Are you kiddi ng me here, senat or?
Also, what have all of these organ izati ons/ Acts done latel y? Does anyon e know? Does anyon e even care? I haven 't seen much of anyth ing going on, becau se thing s get passe d, and then they do not get enfor ced. But, peopl e do not quest ion anyth ing. They just go along, think ing that these thing s are going into actio n, thoug h I can walk down the stree t each day, and find two adora ble, littl e doggi es runni ng aroun d in the road. -_- One more time that I find them in the road, I will eithe r call some sort of anima l servi ces or I will take them and put them into lovin g homes , homes that do not want their cute, littl e doggi es getti ng compl etely smoos hed like road kill on the side of the road. -_-
I feel like e- maili ng this Senat or guy throu gh his littl e websi te that he has again , but I'll just end up with 1) him think ing that peopl e who suppo rt all life are just crazy , and ruin it for the anima l front (becau se I'd be sayin g the same thing right here, and we all know polit ician s -- they don' t give a fuck what I have to say, unles s I start a HUGE thing up about it, and get many peopl e into it), or 2) it' ll give anima l liber ators a "bad name, " becau se littl e, young me wants to quest ion autho rity.
Is this truly right ? Shoul d we all just go along with whate ver the gover nment says? No.
I quite recently got this letter from one of our senators, because I e-mailed his office, telling him what I thought about animal testing:
Dear Ms. Jones
Thank
Curre
Becau
Anima
In addit
I have long belie
Again
Since
Charl
Unite
He doesn
Also,
I feel like e-
Is this truly
Current Mood:
confused
Current Music: Suicide Silence
Leave a comment
